ASHRAE's Position on Air Cleaners: A Look into Air Quality Standards and Emerging Research

ASHRAE's Position on Air Cleaners and reading between the lines!

ASHRAE’s position paper is a significant document that reflects the organisation’s commitment to addressing the impact of HVAC-related technologies on human exposure to airborne contaminants. The paper highlights the importance of air cleaning technologies in improving indoor air quality by filtering or neutralising contaminants from both indoor and outdoor sources. However, ASHRAE also underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of these technologies, noting that their effectiveness can vary depending on factors such as the type of technology used, how it's applied, and the specific contaminants being targeted.

ASHRAE emphasises a balanced approach, acknowledging that while air cleaners can be beneficial, they come with potential drawbacks. For instance, some technologies might emit by-products or influence how people perceive air quality rather than improving the actual air quality itself. This distinction is critical for professionals in the HVAC industry as it points to the need for careful consideration and application of air cleaning technologies to avoid unintended consequences.

My Take

Reading the document, you can see the hours poured over it to get it technically correct, have the right tone, and tread a line. Knowing some of the authors, as I do, they would have taken this very seriously.

Overall, it's a solid position, but there is a but.

And I completely understand why. But I couldn't help coming away from it feeling that depending on your perspective or world view on this tech, you could come away from it with very different takeaways.

Let me put my slightly cynical hat on and make some points.

Need for More Research:

The document’s call for additional research to quantify the benefits of filtration and air cleaning suggests that the current evidence base may not be as solid as it should be. This could indicate a recognition that the purported benefits of these systems may not be fully understood or may have been overstated based on existing studies.

Predicting By-Products and Long-Term Risks:

The recommendation for research on by-products generated over the service life of these devices highlights potential risks that have yet to be thoroughly investigated. This suggests that you could make the argument that the industry may have overlooked important health considerations in its rush to market these technologies.

Application-Relevant Testing:

The document’s push for laboratory testing under conditions that more closely simulate real-world applications reflects a recognition that current testing methods might not be fully predictive of actual performance. This gap between lab and field performance could mean that many technologies currently in use are not as effective or even as safe as their lab results suggest.

Whole Service Life Assessment:

The emphasis on assessing devices over their entire service life rather than just under initial conditions indicates that there may be degradation in performance or even safety over time, which is not being adequately captured in current evaluations. This could lead to users being unaware of the declining efficacy of their air cleaning systems.

Expanding Standards and Guidelines:

The call for more comprehensive standards and guidelines suggests that the current regulatory framework may be insufficient, particularly for newer technologies. This implies that many products on the market may not be held to rigorous standards, potentially leading to inconsistent performance and safety.

Health Risk Reduction Protocol:

The suggestion to develop a standard protocol for estimating health risk reductions based on laboratory performance hints that existing claims about health benefits might be speculative or not backed by robust evidence. This raises questions about the true health impact of these technologies and whether they deliver on their promises.

Comparative Evaluation with Ventilation:

The recommendation to compare the effectiveness of filtration and air cleaning with traditional ventilation methods, as well as their energy and carbon impacts, suggests that the advantages of these advanced technologies may not be as clear-cut as often portrayed.

Finally, the call for research on the integration of air cleaning technologies with HVAC systems and their impact on energy consumption reflects concerns that these systems might not be as efficient or environmentally sustainable as claimed. This could lead to higher operational costs and environmental impacts than users might expect.

Now, I have been a bit cynical here; I get that.

And you could do this to almost any position document.

Emerging evidence clearly shows that air cleaners can have a positive impact on buildings in the right circumstances, but I'd be interested to hear what you think when you read this document and what your takeaway is.

And compared to where we were even a couple of years ago during the pandemic when the anything is better than nothing approach was king, I think it's actually pretty amazing to see how quickly this sector is getting organised.

The Role of Ventilation in Schools: Insights from Recent Research

We also explored a recent study on ventilation rates in UK schools, which provides valuable insights into how well classrooms are ventilated and the implications for student health. The study, conducted in 322 schools, revealed that ventilation was generally better in warmer weather and worse in colder weather, which might seem counterintuitive given the traditional understanding of natural ventilation.

The research found that most schools managed to keep CO2 levels below recommended limits, but schools in more deprived areas and state-funded schools tended to have higher CO2 levels, indicating poorer ventilation. This highlights a significant issue: exposure to poor air quality is not evenly distributed, with disadvantaged areas being more at risk. For professionals in the HVAC field, this underscores the need for targeted interventions in these areas to ensure equitable access to healthy indoor environments.

For more information, check out https://www.airqualitymatters.net/podcast

Check out our sponsors.

21 Degees, Lindab, Aico, Ultra Protect and InBiot